Faculty of Humanities
F.H. van Eemeren
prof.dr. F.H. (Frans) van Eemeren
Capaciteitsgroep Taalbeheersing, Argumentatietheorie en Retorica University of Amsterdam


Spuistraat 134
1012 VB Amsterdam

Telephone
0205254711

http://home.medewerker.uva.nl/f.h.vaneemeren/
Email



Publications

refereed academic publications (56)


2012

  • F. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2012). The Extended Pragma-Dialectical Argumentation Theory Empirically Investigated. In Frans.H. van Eemeren & Bart Garssen (Eds.), Topical Themes in Argumentation Theory; Twenty Exploratory Studies (Argumentation Library) (pp. 323-343). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2012). Effectiveness through reasonableness: a pragma-dialectical perspective: preliminary steps to pragma-dialectical effectiveness research. Argumentation, 26(1), 33-53.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2012). The disguised abusive ad hominem empirically investigated; strategic maneuvering with direct personal attacks. Thinking and Reasoning.

2011

2010

  • F. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2010). De uitgebreide pragma-dialectische argumentatietheorie empirisch geïnterpreteerd. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 32(1), 49-62.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2010). 'In varietate concordia' - United in diversity: European parliamentary debate as an argumentative activity type. Controversia, 7(1), 19-37.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2010). Linguistic criteria for judging composition and division fallacies. In A. Capone (Ed.), Perspectives on language use and pragmatics: a volume in memory of Sorin Stati (LINCOM studies in pragmatics, 16) (pp. 35-50). München: Lincom Europa.
  • F. Snoeck Henkemans, F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2010). Profils dialectiques et indicateurs de 'coups' argumentatifs. Verbum : revue de linguistique publiée par l'Université de Nancy II, 32(1), 53-71.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2010). Strategic maneuvering in political discourse: a pragma-dialectical approach [introduction]. Controversia, 7(1), 11-15.

2009

  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2009). Analysis and evaluation of argumentative discourse. In J. Renkema (Ed.), Discourse, of course: an overview of research in discourse studies (pp. 171-184). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2009). Strategic manoeuvring between rhetorical effectiveness and dialectical reasonableness. In H. Jales Ribeiro & H. Jales Ribeiro (Eds.), Rhetoric and argumentation in the beginning of the XXIst century (pp. 55-72). Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, S. Greco Morasso, M. Grossen, A.-N. Perret-Clermont & E. Rigotti (2009). Argupolis: a doctoral program on argumentation practices in different contexts. Studies in Communication Sciences, 9(1), 289-301.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2009). The fallacies of composition and division revisited. Cogency, 1(1), 23-42.
  • F. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2009). Fallacies and judgments of reasonableness: empirical research concerning the pragma-dialectical discussion rules (Argumentation library, 16). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2009). Putting pragma-dialectics into practice. In J. Sobocan & L. Groarke (Eds.), Critical thinking education and assessment: can higher order thinking be tested? (pp. 247-262) London, ONT: Althouse.

2008

  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). Within the bounds of reason: strategic maneuvering in argumentative discourse. In K. Korta & J. Garmendia (Eds.), Meaning, intentions, and argumentation (CSLI lecture notes, 186) (pp. 209-235). Stanford: CSLI Publications.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). The language of argumentation in Dutch. Argumentation and Advocacy, 44(3), 155-158.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2008). Preface. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (Controversies, 6) (pp. vii-viii). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (2008). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(3), 475-493.
  • F. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2008). Reasonableness in confrontation: empirical evidence concerning the assessment of ad hominem fallacies. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (Controversies, 6) (pp. 181-195). Amsterdam etc.: John Benjamins.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, D.C. Williams & I.Z. Zagar (2008). Preface. In F.H. van Eemeren, D.C. Williams & I.Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 9). Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (2008). Una teoria sistematica dell'argomentazione: l'approccio pragma-dialettico (Il quadrato delle opposizioni). Milano: Mimesis.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). Rhetoric in a dialectical framework: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. In E. Weigand (Ed.), Dialogue and rhetoric (Dialogue studies, 2) (pp. 133-151). Amsterdam/NewYork: Benjamins.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). Kinship: the relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. In G. Hauser (Ed.), Philosophy and rhetoric in dialogue: redrawing their intellectual landscape (pp. 51-70). University park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: exploring the boundaries of reasonableness. In F.H. van Eemeren, D.C. Williams & I.Z. Zagar (Eds.), Understanding argumentation: work in progress (pp. 13-25). Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (2008). Controversy and confrontation in argumentative discourse. In F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.), Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (Controversies, 6) (pp. 1-26). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). The study of argumentation. In A.A. Lunsford, K.H. Wilson & R.A. Eberly (Eds.), The Sage handbook of rhetorical studies (pp. 109-124). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). Special issue on Strategic Maneuvering in Institutional Contexts dedicated to Peter Houtlosser (1956-2008). Argumentation, 22(3), 305-315.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). The need for well-considered normativity in the study of argumentation. In T. Suzuki, T. Kato & A. Kubuta (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd Tokyo Conference on Argumentation: argumentation, the law and justice (pp. 57-65). Tokyo: Japan Debate Association.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). Valuing validity as reasonableness: rationale for a pragma-dialectical perspective. In P. Nerhot (Ed.), Truth and judgement (Filosofia, 195) (pp. 199-222). Milano: Franco Angeli.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2008). Rhetoric, argument and persuasion. In W. Donsbach (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of communication. - Vol. 9: Precision journalism, rhetoric in Western Europe: Britain (pp. 4215-4219). Malden, MA [etc.]: Blackwell.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B. Garssen (Eds.). (2008). Controversy and confrontation: relating controversy analysis with argumentation theory (Controversies, 6). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

2007

  • F.H. van Eemeren, B.J. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2007). Convergent operations in empirical ad hominem research. In F.H..van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, Ch.A. Willard & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 367-373). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2007). Goodwin gets her gun. Comments on Jean Goodwin's "What, in practice, is an argument?". In A. Anthony Blais, H. Hansen, R. Johnson & C. Tindale (Eds.), Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Windsor: University of Windsor.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Countering fallacious moves. Argumentation, 21(3), 243-252.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Seizing the occasion. Parameters for analysing ways of strategic manoeuvring. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.H. Blair, Ch.A. Willard & B.J. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. 375-380). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Strategic manoeuvring: A synthetic recapitulation. Argumentation, 20, 381-392.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: Exploring the boundaries of reasonableness. In T. Dubrovskaya, M. Kuczynski & O Abramova (Eds.), Modern Developments in Linguistics and Language Teaching: International Conference Proceedings I/II (pp. 5-22). Moscow: International Independent University of Ecology and Political Science.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2007). Reasonableness in situated discourse: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring. University of Bucharest Review, 9(2), 5-20.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). The contextuality of fallacies. Informal logic, 27(1), 59-67.
  • A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In J.A. Blair, H. Hansen, R. Johnson & C. Tindale (Eds.), Dissensus and the search for common ground ( CD ROM ). Windsor: University of Windsor, Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA).
  • F.H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (2007). Argumentative indicators in discourse: a pragma-dialectical study. (Argumentation library, 12). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse: Maintaining a delicate balance. Discourse Studies, 5, 238-267.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Kinship: The relationship between Johnstone's ideas about philosophical argument and the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 40(1), 51-70.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). The study of argumentation as normative pragmatics. Pragmatics & Cognition, 15(1), 161-177.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). A procedural view of critical reasonableness. In T. Dubrovskaya, M. Kuczyński & O. Abrahamova (Eds.), Modern Developments in Linguistics and Language Teaching: international conference proceedings (pp. 77-85). Moscow: International Independent University of Ecology and Political Science.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Reconnecting dialectic and rhetoric: fallacies as derailments of strategic manoeuvring in argumentative discourse. Anthropology & Philosophy, 8(1-2), 49-67.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2007). De conventionele deugdelijkheid van de pragma-dialectische discussieregels. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 251-274.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Coming to grips with argumentative discourse. In H.V. Hansen & R. Pinto (Eds.), Reason Reclaimed. Festschrift for J. Anthony Blair and Ralph Johnson (Studies in Critical Thinking and Informal Logic, 5) (pp. 44-59). Newport: Vale Press.

2006

  • B.J. Garssen, F.H. van Eemeren & B. Meuffels (2006). This can't be true, that would be terrible: Ordinary arguers judgments about ad consequentiam fallacies. In C.A. Willard (Ed.), Critical Problems in Argumentation. Selected Papers (pp. 669-675). Washington DC: National Communication Association.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2006). Complementary dialectical and rhetorical considerations. An analysis of a burden of proof manipulation. In F.H. Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (Eds.), Contemporary Perspectives on Argumentation: Views from the Venice Argumentation Conference (pp. 37-46). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2006). Countering fallacious moves. In P. Riley (Ed.), Engaging Argument. Selected Papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensic Association and the University of Utah. (pp. 432-437). Alta: National Communication Association.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2006). Apples and oranges, peer pressure, and other such troublemakers: ordinary arguers' opinions about violations of the pragma-dialectical argument scheme rule. In P. Riley & C. Willis-Chun (Eds.), Engaging argument: selected papers from the 2005 NCA/AFA Summer Conference on Argumentation: sponsored by the National Communication Association, the American Forensics Association, and the University of Utah (pp. 445-452). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, B. Garssen & B. Meuffels (2006). La validez convencional de la regla pragma-dialectica de libertad. Praxis, 9, 17-32.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2006). The case of pragma-dialectics. In S. Parsons & N. Maudet (Eds.), Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. Second International Workshop, ArgMAS 2005, Revised Selected and Invited Papers. (pp. 1-28). Berlin: Springer.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2006). Strategisch manoeuvreren, het model van een kritische discussie en conventionele actietypen. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 28(1), 1-14.

academic publications (19)


2011

  • F. van Eemeren & F. Snoeck Henkemans (2011). Argumentatie: inleiding in het identificeren van meningsverschillen en het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. - 4e herz. dr. Groningen: Noordhoff.

2009

2008

  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). Más sobre falacias como descarrilamientos de maniobras estratégicas: el caso de 'tu quoque'. In C. Santibáñez Yáñez & R. Marafioti (Eds.), De las falacias: argumentación y comunicación (Ciencias del lenguaje) (pp. 37-51). Buenos Aires: Biblos.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2008). The development of the pragma-dialectical approach to argumentation. In A.J. Aguayo & T.R. Steffensmeier (Eds.), Readings on argumentation (pp. 12-25). Strata Publishing: State College, PA.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, D.C. Williams & I.Z. Zagar (Eds.). (2008). Understanding argumentation: work in progress. Amsterdam: Sic Sat-Rozenberg.

2007

  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). De retoriek van Willem van Oranje's 'Apologie' in dialectisch perspectief. In K. Korevaeart, H. Jansen & J. de Jong (Eds.), Het woud van de retorica. Bundel voor Antoine Braet bij zijn afscheid van de Opleiding Nederlandse taal en cultuur van de Universiteit Leiden (SNL reeks, 17). Leiden: Stichting Neerlandsitiek Leiden.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Argumentacija i razoumnost. In A.I. Migounov & E.N. Lisanyuk (Eds.), Mysl'. Yearbook of the St. Petersburg Philosophical Society (pp. 7-22). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Argumentation and reasonabless. Maintaining a delicate balance in strategic manoeuvring. Argumentation, interpretation, rhetoric: online journal.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Preface special issue 'Perspectives on strategic maneuvering'. Argumentation, 20, 377-380.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007). Manobriando estratégicamente: Manteniendo un delicado balance. In C. Santibánez Yánez & B. Riffo Ocares (Eds.), Estudios en argumentación y retórica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones (pp. 83-121). Concepcion: Editorial Universidad de Concepcion.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, P. Houtlosser & A.F. Snoeck Henkemans (2007). Dialectical profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. In J. Anthony Blair, H. Hansen, R. Johnson & C. Tindale (Eds.), Ontario Society for the Study of Argumentation (OSSA) Proceedings 2007 [CD-ROM]. Windsor: University of Windsor.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2007, March 29). Countering fallacious moves. Münster, Presentation at the 11th International Conference on Dialogue Analysis at the University of Münster.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, R. Pilgram & J.H.M. Wagemans (2007). Werkboek argumentatie: Inleiding in het analyseren, beoordelen en houden van betogen. Heerlen: Open Universiteit Nederland.
  • F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, CH.A. Willard & B.J. Garssen (2007). Preface. In F.H. van Eemeren, J.A. Blair, CH.A. Willard & B. Garssen (Eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth Conference of the International Society for the Study of Argumentation (pp. xv). Amsterdam: Sic Sat.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2007). Consideren la brecha: Conciliando la búsqueda del éxito con la persistencia de la razonabilidad. In C. Santibánez Yánez & B. Riffo Ocares (Eds.), Estudios en argumentación y retorica. Teorías contemporáneas y aplicaciones (pp. 57-81). Concepcion: Editorial Universidad de Concepcion.
  • F.H. van Eemeren (2007). Prefacio a la Segunda edición en Chile. In F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (Eds.), Argumentación, Communicatión y Falacias. Una Perspectiva Pragma-Dialectica (2nd ed) (pp. 17-18). Chile: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & R. Grootendorst (2007). Argumentación, comunicación y falacias. Una perspectiva pragma-dialéctica. Chili: Ediciones Universidad Católica de Chile.
  • A.F. Snoeck Henkemans, F.H. van Eemeren & P. Houtlosser (2007, June 8). Dialectical Profiles and indicators of argumentative moves. Windsor, Ontario, Conference of the Ontario Society for the study of Argumentation at the University of Windsor.
  • F.H. van Eemeren & B.J. Garssen (2007). Kwantitatief emperisch onderzoek van argumentatie. Ter inleiding. Tijdschrift voor Taalbeheersing, 29(3), 193-195.

professional publications (1)


2011

This page has been automatically generated by the UvA-Current Reseach Information System.
If you have any questions about the content of this page, please contact .